Essay --

Following the publication of the book The Analysis of the Self, Heinz Kohut created a revolutionary theory to represent a new branch of analytic thinking ego-psychology (OLeary, Trumpeter, Watson, & Weathington, 2008). The idea of self-psychology is based on a series of fittings made inwardly adolescence following a general pattern. Firstly, the child must develop the self, which consists of the childs feelings and thoughts on the surrounding environment. Born with a nuclear self, children are exposed to a virtual self presented by the parental figures. To achieve proper stability and structure, children need to first live on narcissistic to develop a mother wit of worth and permanence, giving flair to the grandiose self (Banai, Mikulincer, & Shaver, 2005). Kohut proposed the idea of adaptive narcissism ( unequivocal) and maladaptive narcissism (negative), two forms of the same narcissistic tendencies (OLeary, Trumpeter, Watson, & Weathington, 2008).Kohut believed development of the self, being a new adaptation to Freuds id/ego/superego theory, took place within cardinal axes the grandiosity bloc, the idealization axis, and the alter ego-connectedness axis. The grandiosity axis refers to the childs ability to preserve a controlling outlook upon life and keep back a balanced self-esteem. A normal, healthy adult possesses the ability to rent ambitious endeavors, present commitment to worthwhile tasks, and retain assertiveness, if this particular axis is well developed essentially, this axis is the embodiment of the childs sense of self-worth. The idealization axis coincides with the wants and desires of a person. The ability to sustain a balanced goal system is the key to the development of the idealization axis a normal, ... ...r, certain circumstances reap negative consequences. Generally speaking, such actions communicate subconsciously in response to an unspoken bond or astonishment for the subjects mentor. Often times, things, such as physica l appearance, call tone or attitude, posture, eye contact, distance, and body language, may be mimicked unwantedly. This adaptation usually leads to a charismatic attitude, persuasive dialect, intimate camaraderie, and an overall positive feel to the relationship. Not all things mimicked will be a positive trait, however, nor will the adaptations always be seen as a good thing. such adaptations may cause an awkward reaction if the mentor is uncomfortable with the situation. The abrupt threat of the mentors unique nature may be seen as a social faux pa, causing a unobtrusiveness to creep into the relationship because of the newfound insecurity (Thompson, 2012).